Page 8 - SMU Spring 2020

TEAM PHYSICIAN’S CORNER

REFERENCES

1. O’Connor M, et al. Return to play after hip arthroscopy: 18. Matheney T, et al. Activity level and severity of dysplasia predict
A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2018. age at Bernese periacetabular osteotomy for symptomatic hip
46(11):2780-2788. dysplasia. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016. 98(8):665-71.
2. Westermann RW, et al. Trends in hip arthroscopic labral repair: 19. Hunt D, et al. Clinical outcomes analysis of conservative
An American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery database study. and surgical treatment of patients with clinical indications of
Arthroscopy. 2019. 35(5):1413-1419. prearthritic, intra-articular hip disorders. PM R. 2012. 4(7):479-87.
3. Duchman KR, et al. Who is performing hip arthroscopy?: 20. Okoroafor UC, et al. Activity level maintenance at midterm
An analysis of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery follow-up among active patients undergoing periacetabular
Part-II Database. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017. 99(24):2103-2109. osteotomy. Am J Sports Med. 2019. 47(14):3455-3459.
4. Nwachukwu BU, et al. Arthroscopic versus open treatment of 21. Wyles CC, et al. Natural history of the dysplastic hip following
femoroacetabular impingement: A systematic review of medium- modern periacetabular osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019.
to long-term outcomes. Am J Sports Med. 2016. 44(4):1062-1068. 101(10):932-938.
5. Zhang D, Chen L, Wang G. Hip arthroscopy versus open surgical 22. Heyworth BE, et al. Return to play after periacetabular osteotomy
dislocation for femoroacetabular impingement: A systematic for treatment of acetabular dysplasia in adolescent and young
review and meta-analysis. Medicine. 2016. 95(41). adult athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2016. 44(6):1573-81.
6. Ahmad SS, et al. Surgical hip dislocation is more powerful than 23. Sabbag CM, et al. The addition of hip arthroscopy to
arthroscopy for achieving high degrees of acetabular correction periacetabular osteotomy does not increase complication rates:
in pincer type impingement. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019. A prospective case series. Am J Sports Med. 2019. 47(3):543-551.
105(7):1339-1344. 24. Domb BG, et al. Hip arthroscopic surgery with labral preservation
7. Minkara AA, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis and capsular plication in patients with borderline hip dysplasia:
of outcomes after hip arthroscopy in femoroacetabular Minimum 5-year patient-reported outcomes. Am J Sports Med.
impingement. Am J Sports Med. 2019. 47(2):488-500. 2018. 46(2):305-313.
8. Griffin DR, et al. Hip arthroscopy versus best conservative care 25. Domb BG, et al. Arthroscopic capsular plication and labral
for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome preservation in borderline hip dysplasia: Two-year clinical
(UK FASHIoN): A multicentre randomised controlled trial. outcomes of a surgical approach to a challenging problem.
The Lancet. 2018. 391(10136):2225-2235. Am J Sports Med. 2013. 41(11):2591-8.
9. Palmer A, et al. Protocol for the Femoroacetabular Impingement 26. Chaharbakhshi EO, et al. Do ligamentum teres tears portend
Trial (FAIT): A multi-centre randomised controlled trial inferior outcomes in patients with borderline dysplasia
comparing surgical and non-surgical management of undergoing hip arthroscopic surgery? A match-controlled
femoroacetabular impingement. Bone Joint Res. 2014. 3(11):321-327. study with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2017.
10. Novais EN, et al. Do young female dancers improve symptoms 45(11):2507-2516.
and return to dancing after periacetabular osteotomy for the 27. Cvetanovich GL, et al. Do patients with borderline dysplasia
treatment of symptomatic hip dysplasia? J Hip Preserv Surg. 2018. have inferior outcomes after hip arthroscopic surgery for
5(2):150-156. femoroacetabular impingement compared with patients with
11. Mitchell RJ, et al. Radiographic evidence of hip microinstability normal acetabular coverage? Am J Sports Med. 2017. 45(9):2116-2124.
in elite ballet. Arthroscopy. 2016. 32(6):1038-1044 e1. 28. Chaharbakhshi EO, et al. Is hip arthroscopy effective in patients
12. Harris JD, et al. Radiographic prevalence of dysplasia, cam, and with combined excessive femoral anteversion and borderline
pincer deformities in elite ballet. Am J Sports Med. 2016. 44(1):20-7. dysplasia? Response. Am J Sports Med. 2019. 47(11):NP62-NP63.
13. Larson CM, et al. Radiographic hip anatomy correlates with range 29. Lall AC, et al. Does femoral retroversion adversely affect outcomes
of motion and symptoms in National Hockey League Players. after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement
Am J Sports Med. 2017. 45(7):1633-1639. syndrome? A midterm analysis. Arthroscopy. 2019. 35(11):3035-3046.
14. Whiteside D, et al. Femoroacetabular impingement in elite 30. Chaharbakhshi EO, et al. Is hip arthroscopy effective in patients
ice hockey goaltenders: Etiological implications of on-ice hip with combined excessive femoral anteversion and borderline
mechanics. Am J Sports Med. 2015. 43(7):1689-97. dysplasia? A match-controlled study. Am J Sports Med. 2019.
47(1):123-130.
15. Ross JR, et al. Characterization of symptomatic hip impingement
in butterfly ice hockey goalies. Arthroscopy. 2015. 31(4):635-42. 31. Kraeutler MJ, et al. Femoral version abnormalities significantly
outweigh effect of cam impingement on hip internal rotation.
16. Byrd JWT, et al. Hip dysplasia in wrestlers: Three lessons learned. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018. 100(3):205-210.
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2017. 4(4):332-336.
32. Larson CM, Pierce BR, Giveans MR. Treatment of athletes with
17. Weber AE, et al. The hyperflexible hip: Managing hip pain in the symptomatic intra-articular hip pathology and athletic pubalgia/
dancer and gymnast. Sports Health. 2015. 7(4):346-58.
sports hernia: A case series. Arthroscopy 2011. 27(6):768-75.

 6 SPORTS MEDICINE UPDATE | Spring 2020, Issue 2